This website uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience, improve site performance, and gather analytics. By selecting 'Accept,' you consent to these cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.

Logo

Osseodensification vs Conventional Drilling for Immediate Dental Implant Placement

Sponsored by Mohamad Ali Itani

About this trial

Last updated 10 months ago

Study ID

2025-H-0162-D-M-0696

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Type

Interventional

Phase

N/A

Placebo

No

Accepting

25 to 45 Years
All Sexes

Trial Timing

Ended 5 months ago

What is this trial about?

Aim of the study is to analyze and compare the characteristic differences occurring in the surrounding bone in an immediate implant placed by osseodensification to immediate implants placed with the conventional technique

What are the participation requirements?

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patient age 25 to 45 years old

2. Systemically and periodontally healthy individuals.

3. Non-smokers or light smokers (Less than 5 cigarettes a day) (Schane 2010).

4. Good oral hygiene.

5. Healthy remaining dentition.

6. Adequate quality and quantity of bone

7. Interradicular septum ≥ 2 mm (Bleyan, 2022).

8. Mandibular non-restorable molars.

9. Type A or B socket (Smith and Tarnow, 2013).

Exclusion Criteria

1. Acute inflammation or infection in the implant region.

2. Patients with mental disorders who could not cooperate with treatment or communicate normally.

3. Patients who have severe systemic disorders (Uncontrolled Diabetes, Uncontrolled Hypertension, End stage kidney or liver diseases and Severe Heart diseases) .

4. Poor oral hygiene.

5. Active periodontal disease.

6. Uncooperative patients, not willing to adhere to post-surgical instructions and follow up visits.